Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 F.3d 513 - United States v. Tuley

United States v. Tuley’s Empirical Analysis

161 F.3d 513 · 1998

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
5
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2021

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

601998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Adams v. Williams · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Pelaes v. United States · Johnson v. Righetti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Blocking a vehicle so its occupant is unable to leave during the course of an investigatory stop is reasonable to maintain the status quo while completing the purpose of the stop.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.