Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 F.3d 655 - Duren v. Hopper

Duren v. Hopper’s Empirical Analysis

161 F.3d 655 · 1998

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
February 2015
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably Tompkins v. Moore (1999), Hardwick v. Crosby (2003)

19 federal appellate ·

120199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McMann v. Richardson · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Ake v. Oklahoma · Payne v. Tennessee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is no reasonable probability that the result of the penalty phase would have been different, even if the suggested evidence of alcohol and drug abuse had been explored in great detail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.