Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 F.3d 681 - Bruning v. Hirose

Bruning v. Hirose’s Empirical Analysis

161 F.3d 681 · 1998

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
January 2017
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably Amgen Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (2003), Process Control Corporation v. V. Hydreclaim Corporation, Defendant-Cross (1999)

12 federal appellate · 7 district ·

210199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 120 · 35 U.S.C. § 251 · 35 U.S.C. § 282 · 35 U.S.C. § 304 (§ 1 of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980) · 35 U.S.C. § 305 (§ 1 of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980)

Relies on Hybritech Inc. v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc. · Price v. Symsek · Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/S · Monarch Knitting Machinery Corp. v. Sulzer Morat GmbH · Chemcast Corporation v. Arco Industries Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “During an interference involving a patent issued from an application that was copending with the interfering application, the appropriate standard of proof for validity challenges is the preponderance of the evidence standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “how to make and use the full scope of the claimed invention without undue experimentation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.