Rodriguez v. Artuz’s Empirical Analysis
161 F.3d 763 · 1998
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably Lucidore v. New York State Division of Parole (2000), David Warren v. Henry Garvin, Supt. Mid-Orange Correctional Facility, Robert Hanslmaier (2000)
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on 990 F. Supp. 275 - Rodriguez v. Artuz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for substantially the reasons stated by the district court”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.