Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 F.3d 941 - Sonnier v. Johnson

Sonnier v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

161 F.3d 941 · 1998

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Kelvin Morris No As-1924 v. Martin Horn Commissioner Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (1999), Turner v. Johnson (1999)

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

220199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Houston v. Lack · Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc. · Carson v. Johnson · Flanagan v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he lack of a ruling on a COA in the district court causes this court to be without jurisdiction to consider the appeal.” (emphasis added));”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The rule contemplates that the district court will make the first judgment whether a COA should issue and on which issues, and that the circuit court will be informed by the district court’s determination in its own decisionmaking. [W]e are cognizant of the district court’s superior familiarity with this habeas petition. Its considerable experience with this case should allow it accurately to determine which issues satisfy the COA requirement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “for the district court to revisit the issue of time-bar, including the Suspension Clause issue if the court again finds the application to be time-barred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.