Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 F.3d 992 - United States v. Maliszewski

United States v. Maliszewski’s Empirical Analysis

161 F.3d 992 · 1998

Citation profile

154
cited by 154 later decisions
August 2022
most recently cited

67 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 154 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably United States v. Layne (1999), United States of America v. Anthony Gibbs Richard Hough Donneto Berry Chad Gibbs Robert Curtis Lamont Needum Antwan Woods (1999)

67 federal appellate ·

10801998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1862

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Henderson v. Brown · Schlossberg v. Maryland Comptroller of the Treasury · Epps v. West · Hervey v. Shalala

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 154 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] defendant claiming insufficiency of the evidence bears a heavy burden.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a statement by a coconspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.