Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

161 F. App'x 210

In re Wallace

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 4, 2006

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-01-04

Relies on Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Decided 2006-01-04

¶1OPINION

PER CURIAM.

¶2Margaret Wallace asks that we issue a writ of mandamus directing Honorable R. Barclay Surrick to recuse himself because he has failed to rule on alleged attorney fraud that Wallace has documented in the record. Wallace additionally asks this Court to adjudicate the issues of attorney fraud she presented to the District Court. For the reasons that follow, we will deny the petition.

¶3The District Court dismissed Wallace’s Complaint on November 18, 2005, pursuant to Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir.1984). Wallace has appealed from that order. See C.A. 05-5216.

¶4Thus, we will dismiss this mandamus petition as moot.

/161/fappx/210 · .json · Public domain