Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 FAPPX 461 - Lichtenstein v. Barbanel

Lichtenstein v. Barbanel’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
September 2016
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on United States v. Olano · Johnson v. Zerbst · Francine Klingman v. Melvin E. Levinson · Telespectrum, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Kentucky · Hayhoe v. Cole (In Re Cole)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A pre-petition stipulation in a state-court action waiving a debtor’s right to obtain a discharge of a specific debt in a future bankruptcy case is void because it offends the public policy of promoting a fresh start for individual debtors. Because it is executed before bankruptcy proceedings begin and is not approved by a bankruptcy court, such pre-petition waivers of discharge do not satisfy the statutory requirements for a waiver of discharge under § 727(a)(10).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An agreement between a holder of a claim and the debtor ... is enforceable only to any extent enforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law, whether or not discharge of such debt is waived, only if—”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a) The court shall grant the debtor a discharge, unless— (10) The court approves a written waiver of discharge executed by the debtor after the order for relief under this chapter[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.