Kafele v. Lerner Sampson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2021
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1257
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. · Johnson v. De Grandy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is simply no way for this or any other court to grant relief without disturbing the judgments of foreclosure entered by the state court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“holding pro se litigants are not relieved of the duty to develop claims with an appropriate degree of specificity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“without being holders in due course of their claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.