Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 F.R.D. 347 - Helm v. Resolution Trust Corp.

Helm v. Resolution Trust Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 2002
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1821

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Link v. Wabash Railroad · Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · Klapprott v. United States · United States v. Di Mucci

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the case law consistently teaches that out-and-out lawyer blunders—the type of action or inaction that leads to successful malpractice suits by the injured client—do not qualify as `mistake' or `excusable neglect' within the meaning of [Rule 60(b)(1)].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.