161 F. Supp. 261 - Biazevich v. Becker’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
July 2014
most recently cited
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 161 (§ 11 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 1005
Relies on Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · Northrop Corporation v. Madden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Plaintiffs are not entitled by Section 11(2) of the Act [National Labor Relations Act] to maintain this action. That Section permits district court enforcement of subpenas only upon suit of the Board, and not of a private party. If the Board declines to institute an ex rel. proceeding for the enforcement of a subpena issued at the request of a private party the propriety of this action can be reviewed under Sections 10(e) and (f) of the Act as described in paragraph 1, above, and such action may not be made the basis for a private suit for injunction in the federal district court. This conclusion is not altered by Section 6(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1005 (c), which does not enlarge the Act’s subpena enforcement procedures.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“* * the general counsel shall, in the name of the Board but on relation of such private party, institute proceedings in the appropriate district court * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilmot v. Doyle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.