Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 FSUPP 567 - White v. Zutell

White v. Zutell’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1971
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1971

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

20195819601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Flamm v. Noble · United States Trust Company of New York v. Territory of New Mexico Territory of New Mexico · Carbondale City School District v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland · McCormick v. . Pennsylvania Central R.R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The restatement rule [cited supra] is manifestly sound since it tends to create uniformity in interest awards among the states for claims of like nature arising out of the same accident, and thereby discourages litigants from shopping for favorable jurisdictions in which to commence suit.” Id. at 569.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.