Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 Ill. App. 3d 285 - People v. Collins

161 Ill. App. 3d 285 - People v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2021

9 state decisions

2019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Dale · 111 Ill. 2d 295 - People v. Martin-Trigona · 132 Ill. App. 3d 713 - People v. Baugh · 124 Ill. App. 3d 974 - People v. Ward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While [section 122 — 1 of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act] has been interpreted as applying not only to those imprisoned but to those who are deprived of liberty in some meaningful way (People v. Martin-Trigona (1986), 111 Ill. 2d 295, 299-300 , 489 N.E.2d 1356, 1358 ), it has not been applied to those whose sentence is completed at the time they file their post-conviction petition and historically post-conviction relief was not available in such circumstances. (See People v. Dale (1950), 406 Ill. 238, 246-47 , 92 N.E.2d 761, 766 .) *** Later sentence enhancement is not a meaningful deprivation of liberty entitling defendant to the avenue of post-conviction relief provided in section 122 — 1 of the Code.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.