Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 IND 311 - Dixon v. Eikenberry

Dixon v. Eikenberry’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1991
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Grattan v. Wiggins · United States Saving Fund & Investment Co. v. Harris · Adair v. Mergentheim · Tallman v. Ely · English v. Aldrich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “purchaser of the decree or of the land, upon a sale pursuant thereto, might otherwise be deceived and imposed upon; and there would seem to be good reason for holding that, by his failure to set up a claim held by him, the plaintiff in a suit to foreclose a mortgage . . . would be estopped to assert it, at. least against a purchaser of the decree without notice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.