Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 Ind. App. 636 - Smith v. State

161 Ind. App. 636 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burton v. State · 8 Md. App. 134 - Franklin v. State · 146 Cal. App. 2d 630 - People v. Ruiz · Thorne v. State · 3 Md. App. 164 - Broadway v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Also, although we find no Indiana decisions specifically on point, it has been held that evidence showing a person has a prohibited drug within his system is circumstantial evidence tending to show he was in possession of the drug prior to taking it. (Citation omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.