161 Ind. App. 650 - Overton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2004
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cree v. Goldstein · Hernandez v. Texas · Smith v. Texas · Whitus v. State of Georgia Whitus · Akins v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'“. . . (1) A felony was committed. (2) Appellant did harbor, conceal, or assist the principal, with intent that he should escape detection, arrest, capture, or punishment. (3) Appellant had knowledge of the crime at the time of giving aid or assistance. (4) Appellant is not related to the person committing the . . . [felony].’ Smith v. State (1951), 229 Ind. 546 , 99 N.E.2d 417 .” Overton v. State (1974), 161 Ind. App. 650 , 317 N.E.2d 467, 471 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Collison v. State“this evidence falls short of supporting a reasonable inference that White acted to harbor, conceal, or assist Overton to escape capture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Clements v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.