Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 KAN 492 - State v. Hannigan

State v. Hannigan’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
November 1965
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 1965

18 state decisions

80194619501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Marshall v. Wyandotte County Gas Co. · Brown v. City of Arkansas City · State ex rel. Mitchell v. City of Coffeyville · State ex rel. Eubanks v. Board of County Commissioners · Johnson v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Either the state or any defendant or other person claiming the property seized may appeal from the judgment of the court in any such special proceeding against property seized, in the manner provided for taking appeals in criminal cases, except that the appeal must be taken within ten days, unless the time be by the court for good cause shown extended. . . .” G. SL 1935, 21-2135.) (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Herpel
  2. ““Cities are creations of the legislature and can exercise only the power conferred by law, they take no power by implication, and the only power they acquire in addition to that expressly granted is that necessary to make effective the power expressly conferred.” (Syl. ¶ 2.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. James v. City of Pittsburg

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.