Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 KY 838 - Beha v. Martin

Beha v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
April 1964
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1964

13 state decisions

80191419201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In a case like this, where the compensation is fixed by the board of directors, who also are a majority of the stockholders, it does not devolve upon the director whose compensation is in question to prove that the compensation is fair; hut the objecting stockholder must establish affirmatively that the salary or compensation is unreasonable and oppressive.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.