Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 MICH 405 - Cooper v. Carr

Cooper v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
5
states following
April 1964
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 1964

18 state decisions

80191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pettibone v. Phelps · McDaniels v. McDaniels · Scripps v. Reilly · Collier v. State · Detroit Tug & Wrecking Co. v. Gartner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To warrant such interference, the abuse ought to be so plain that upon consideration of the facts upon which the trial judge acted, an unprejudiced person can say that there was no justification or excuse for the ruling made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Detroit Tug Wrecking Co. v. Wayne Circuit Judge , 75 Mich. 360 , 371 , 379 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.