Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 MICH 96 - Gale v. Mayhew

Gale v. Mayhew’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
8
states following
March 1963
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1963

10 state decisions

40191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Myers v. . Davis · Markey v. Corey · Aniba v. Yeomans · Fisher v. Meister · Borden v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A qualified indorsement constitutes the indorser a mere assignor of the title to the instrument. It may be made by adding to the indorser’s signature the words ‘ without recourse ’ or any words of similar import. Such an instrument (indorsement) does not impair the negotiable character of the instrument.” (2 How. Stat. 2d Ed. § 2711).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.