Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 Minn. 157 - Nellas v. Carline

Nellas v. Carline’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1985
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1985

2 state decisions

201924193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Timmens · Thompson v. Bickford · Wakefield v. Day · William Weisman Holding Co. v. Miller · Backus v. Burke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In an action at law, a deed absolute, on its face, may be shown to be in fact a mortgage without bringing a bill in equity to have it so declared.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.