Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 Miss. 654 - Holston v. State

Holston v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1990
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1990

8 state decisions

401931194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]irst to inform the officer by the warrant where the premises are, or may be found, and, second, to enable the owner to determine whether the officer has legal authority to make a search, so that resistance will not be made, or should not be made, to the search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is not required to be as technical as in a deed of conveyance... .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.