State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 1975
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 39 Mo. App. 393 - State v. Searcy · State v. Wainwright · Staples v. Shackleford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The question is whether the remarks of the court were such as to prejudice defendant in the minds of ordinary men in the situation of the jury, not whether or not this particular group of men believed they were not influenced against the object of the criticism”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hart“Defendant was entitled to a trial by a jury that had not been urged to hostility against him by the judge of the court on whose words one would expect them to place the greatest reliance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wendel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.