161 N.C. 50
76 S.E 632
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 14, 1912
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1912-12-14
<p>Evidence — Questions for Jury.</p> <p>Upon a rehearing of this case it is held that the rules of law heretofore laid down are correct; but upon reconsidering the facts, the majority of the Court hold the evidence sufficient to be submitted to the juiy.</p> <p>Brown and Allen, JJ., dissenting.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1912-12-14
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1974
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 This is a petition to rehear. There is no division in the Court as to the propositions of law laid down on the former hearing; but upon a fuller consideration of the facts, the majority of the Court are now of opinion that there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to a jury.
¶2 Petition allowed.