161 N.C. App. 527 - State v. Jamerson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
73
cited by 73 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
73 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 153 N.C. App. 69 - State v. Pimental · 151 N.C. App. 136 - State v. Dickson · 155 N.C. App. 773 - State v. Nance · State v. Absher · 110 N.C. App. 837 - State v. Hawkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) defendant lost his right to appeal by failing to take timely action; (2) the appeal is interlocutory; or (3) to review a trial court's denial of a motion for appropriate relief. N.C. R.App. P. 21(a)(1) (2003). In considering appellate Rule 21 and N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A-1444, this Court has reasoned that since the appellate rules prevail over conflicting statutes, we are without authority to issue a writ of certiorari except as provided in Rule 21. State v. Nance, 155 N.C.App. 773 , 574 S.E.2d 692 (2003) ; Pimental, 153 N.C.App. at 73 -74 , 568 S.E.2d at 870 ; State v. Dickson, 151 N.C.App. 136 , 564 S.E.2d 640 (2002).”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“[c]ontains a term of imprisonment that is for a duration not authorized by G.S. 15A-1340.17 or G.S. 15A-1340.23 for the defendant's class of offense and prior record or conviction level.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“'In North Carolina, a defendant's right to appeal in a criminal proceeding is purely a creation of state statute.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.