Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 N.H. 333 - In Re Laura

In Re Laura’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 1 Conn. App. 138 - Brock v. Cavanaugh · In Re Carr · 41 Conn. Super. Ct. 100 - Lownds v. Lownds · Resource Technology Corp. v. Allied Waste Industries, Inc. · In Re Scott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This presumption may be rebutted only through a 'written finding or a specific finding by the presiding officer on the record that the application of the guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate in a particular case.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The legislature adopted them in order to establish a uniform system to determine the amount of child support to be awarded, to resolve inequities in child support orders and to comply with federal law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to ensure that both the custodial and non-custodial parents share in the support responsibility for their children, according to the relative percentage of each parent's income”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.