In Re Laura’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 1 Conn. App. 138 - Brock v. Cavanaugh · In Re Carr · 41 Conn. Super. Ct. 100 - Lownds v. Lownds · Resource Technology Corp. v. Allied Waste Industries, Inc. · In Re Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This presumption may be rebutted only through a 'written finding or a specific finding by the presiding officer on the record that the application of the guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate in a particular case.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The legislature adopted them in order to establish a uniform system to determine the amount of child support to be awarded, to resolve inequities in child support orders and to comply with federal law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to ensure that both the custodial and non-custodial parents share in the support responsibility for their children, according to the relative percentage of each parent's income”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.