State v. Farrington’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
5 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Lay · State v. Lamy · State v. Jennings · United States v. Reaves · State v. Lacasse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as used in the statute means: to make petition to: ENTREAT ... to approach with a request or a plea ... to move to action: serve as an urge or incentive ... to strongly urge ... insist upon ... to entice or lead astray by or as if by specious arguments: lure on and especially into evil ... to endeavor to obtain by asking or pleading: plead for ... to seek eagerly or actively ... to have an effect on (a person or thing) through some natural influence or property ... to seek to affect ... to serve as a temptation or lure to: ATTRACT. Id . at 446-47 , 20 A.3d 291 (quotation omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Owen Labrie“to draw on by arousing hope or desire: ALLURE, ATTRACT ... to draw into evil ways: lead astray: TEMPT.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Owen Labrie“to tempt with a promise of pleasure or gain: ALLURE, ATTRACT, ENTICE , INVITE,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Owen Labrie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.