State v. EULIANO’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 district · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Hamling v. United States · In re Vey · 37 Cal. 4th 310 - People v. Harris · United States of America John Alexis Mojica-Baez United States of America Josue Reyes-Hernandez United States of America Rodolfo Landa-Rivera United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If all three of these conditions are met, we may then exercise our discretion to correct a forfeited error only if the error meets a fourth criterion: the error must seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The plain error rule is used sparingly, however, and is limited to those circumstances in which a miscarriage of justice would otherwise result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“For us to find plain error: (1) there must be error; (2) the error must be plain; and (3) the error must affect substantial rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.