Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 NW2D 804 - Lauritsen v. Lammers

Lauritsen v. Lammers’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1993
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 1993

2 state decisions

101968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grenz v. Werre · Froh v. Hein · Larson v. Meyer · Moe v. Kettwig · O'Keefe v. Fitzgerald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “with the express or implied consent of the owner for purposes of the business or pleasure of the owner’s family.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.