¶1 Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the authority of Ray v. N. Y. Bay Extension R. R. Co. (155 N. Y. 102), and Jewelers’ Mercantile Agency v. Rothschild (155 N. Y. 255). No opinion.
¶2 All concur.
161 N.Y. 621
55 N.E 1095
Douglass v. . Halstead
Decided December 5, 1899
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1899-12-05
<p>Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered ¡November 29, 1898, affirming an order of Special Term adjudging defendant William B. Halstead in contempt for the violation of an injunction.</p>
Relies on 9 E.H. Smith 255 - Jewelers' Mercantile Agency v. Rothschild · 9 E.H. Smith 102 - Ray v. New York Bay Extension Railroad
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1899-12-05
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 1974 · most notably Matter of City of N.Y. (Northern Blvd.) (1932), People Ex Rel. Clark v. Gilchrist (1926)
1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →