161 Ohio App. 3d 140 - State v. Chessman’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2024
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Anders v. California · State v. Fitzpatrick · Ross v. Common Pleas Court · Turner v. State of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An issue lacks arguable merit if, on the facts and law involved, no responsible contention can be made that it offers a basis for reversal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.