Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 OHIOAPP3D 778 - State v. Moore

State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably State v. Moore (Slip Opinion) (2016), 179 Ohio App. 3d 97 - State v. Stevens (2008)

53 state decisions

250200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · McMann v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “test. {¶ 52} R.C. § 2929.14 (D)(1)(a)(ii) imposes a mandatory three-year prison term when a defendant is convicted of a firearm specification pursuant to R.C. § 2941.145 . However, a court is not authorized to impose more than one sentence for multiple firearm specifications if the specifications refer to the same criminal act or transaction:”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[P]urely legal issues, and the trial court's application of the law to the facts, are subject to de novo review.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`Transaction,' as used in the firearm specification statutes, has been defined as `a series of continuous acts bound together by time, space and purpose, and directed toward a single objective.' [In addition, o]ther courts have stated that a `transaction' is a `single criminal adventure.' * * * {¶ 58} "`Animus,' in contrast, has been described as `purpose, intent, or motive.' It has also been defined as `immediate motive.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.