Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 Pa. Super. 613 - Commonwealth v. Gross

161 Pa. Super. 613 - Commonwealth v. Gross’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
January 1984
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 1984 · most notably 324 Pa. Super. 420 - Commonwealth v. Taylor (1984), Commonwealth v. Walton (1979)

23 state decisions

11019471950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seth Carter v. State of Texas · United States v. Gale · Commonwealth v. Musto · Commonwealth v. Wallace · Commonwealth v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘A criminal false pretense has been said to be “the false representation of an existing fact, whether by oral or written words or conduct, which is calculated to deceive, intended to deceive, and does, in fact, deceive, and by means of which one person obtains value from another without compensation”: Com. v. Goldberg et al., 130 Pa. Superior Ct. 252, 260 , 196 A. 538, 542 . In order to bring a case within the statute, the following elements must co-exist: (1) a false pretense ; (2) an obtaining of property or something of value thereby; (3) an intent to defraud.’ Com. v. Gross, 161 Pa. Superior Ct. 613, 618 , 56 A. 2d 303, 306 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is true that a complaint or information must contain all the essential elements of the offense sought to be charged, and, if it fails in this respect, it is not sufficient that the indictment supplied them because the defendant should not be required to answer a charge different from and unrelated to the one for which he was arrested and held to bail.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.