Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

161 So. 2d 892

Harrell v. Garner

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1964-03-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1964

Relies on 159 So. 2d 898 - Beikirch v. City of Jacksonville Beach · 117 So. 2d 524 - Hale v. Adams · 63 So. 2d 192 - Henley v. Carter

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1964-03-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. With regard to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment, see Beikirch v. City of Jacksonville Beach (Fla.App.1964) 159 So.2d 898. With regard to the defense of assumption of risk, see Henley v. Carter et al. (Fla.1953) 63 So.2d 192. As to applicability of guest statute, see Hale v. Adams (Fla.App.1960) 117 So.2d 524; (Fla.App.1962) 138 So.2d 761.

STURGIS, C. J, and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
/161/so2d/892 · .json · Public domain