161 So. 3d 103 - State v. Rapp’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “is similar to the standard for appellate review of the sufficiency of evidence to support a defendant's conviction that the court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Johnson · 258 So. 3d 134 - State v. Bibbins

2. “[a]bsent internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with the physical evidence, a single witness' testimony, if believed by the fact finder, is sufficient to support a factual conclusion.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Gabriel · 247 So. 3d 908 - State v. Moffett

3. “1. whether the defendant ever distributed or attempted to distribute the drug; 2. whether the drug was in a form usually associated with possession for distribution to others; 3. whether the amount of drug created an inference of an intent to distribute; 4. whether expert or other testimony established that the amount of drug found in the defendant’s possession is inconsistent with personal use only; and 5. whether there was any paraphernalia, such as baggies or scales, evidencing an intent to distribute.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 171 So. 3d 1176 - State v. Campbell