Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 SO3D 241 - Robertson v. Robertson

Robertson v. Robertson’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Gates · 775 So. 2d 153 - Ex Parte Inverness Construction Company · 746 So. 2d 960 - Ex Parte Pfizer, Inc. · 892 So. 2d 898 - Ex Parte Sawyer · Chamblee v. Pinkerton Security & Investigations Services, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, venue of all proceedings for petitions or other actions seeking modification, interpretation, or enforcement of a final decree awarding custody of a child or children to a parent and/or granting visitation rights, and/or awarding child support, and/or awarding other expenses incident to the support of a . minor child, or children, and/or granting post-minority benefits for a child or children is changed so that venue will lie in: (1) the original circuit court rendering the final decree; or (2) in the circuit court of the county where both the current custodial parent or, in the case of post-minority benefits, where the most recent custodial parent, that parent having custody at the time of the child’s attaining majority, and the child or children have resided for a period of at least three consecutive years immediately preceding the filing of the petition or other action. The current or most recent custodial parent shall be able to choose the particular venue as herein provided, regardless of which party files the petition or other action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.