161 So. 3d 674 - Evans v. Bordelon’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bernard v. Ellis · 118 So. 3d 1200 - Marengo v. Harding · 131 So. 3d 474 - Midland Funding, LLC v. Urrutia · 127 So. 3d 61 - Arceneaux v. Arceneaux · Arceneaux v. Arceneaux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The intent of Article 966(D)(2) was to make it mandatory that any objection to a document filed in support of or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment must be objected to in a timely filed opposition or reply memorandum.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.