Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 SW 925 - Crandall v. Scott

Crandall v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1919
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gates v. Hooper · Texas & Pacific Coal Co. v. Lawson · 24 Tex. Civ. App. 251 - Comer v. Burton-Lingo Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A ‘trust’ is a combination of capital, skill or acts by two or more persons, firms * * * or associations of persons, or either two or more of them for either, any or all of the following purposes: First * * * To create or carry out restrictions in the free pursuit of any business authorized or permitted by the laws of this state. * * * Seventh. To abstain from engaging in or continuing business, * * * partially or entirely within the state of Texas, or any portion thereof.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.