Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 SW2D 1095 - Litton v. Waters

Litton v. Waters’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2011

13 state decisions

6019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Coleman-Fulton Pasture Co. · Jordan v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co. · Garcia v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[R]e-cital of due citation ... must be considered valid, unless and until it is set aside by direct proceedings instituted for that purpose.”). 6 . Counsel for Granado attempted to introduce through Granado the calculations of the principal amount owed and the accumulated interest, but the court sustained the objections to the admissibility of these documents. 7 . Meza argues that this document was not properly authenticated, but counsel for Meza at trial stated”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.