Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1958
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 38 Tex. Crim. 681 - Kugadt v. State · Jackson v. State · 77 Tex. Crim. 517 - Brooks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellant then presented a bystanders’ bill, which bill embodied appellant’s proffered bill No. 12, without the trial court’s qualification thereto. The State did not see fit to file a controverting bystanders1 bill, and we are therefore relegated to a consideration of appellant’s bystanders’ bill * * (Emphasis ours.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Griffith v. Casteel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.