Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 SW2D 304 - McWhorter v. Humphreys

McWhorter v. Humphreys’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1970
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1970

4 state decisions

201941195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Joske v. Irvine · Ormsby v. Ratcliffe · Lee v. International & Great Northern Railway Co. · Stillman v. Hirsch · Larrabee v. Porter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * As stated in Western Assur. Co. v. Busch, Tex.Civ.App., 203 S.W. 460 , ‘The test as to the conclusiveness of the evidence is, Could it reasonably be supposed that the minds of unprejudiced men of ordinary intelligence might differ about it, either as to the weight to be given to the testimony or to the deduction drawn therefrom ? ’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.