Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

161 S.W.3d 892

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 2005

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2005-04-19

Decided 2005-04-19

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Miron Taylor (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error is without merit. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

¶4The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/161/sw3d/892 · .json · Public domain