State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bernard · State v. Harris · State v. Sladek · State v. Hornbuckle · State v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'If evidence of a prior crime is not admissible under any exceptions to the general rule prohibiting its admission, the admission is presumed to be prejudicial.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sapien · State v. Matthews“`[w]e review trial court decisions regarding the admissibility of evidence for prejudice, not mere error, and will reverse only if the error was so prejudicial that it deprived the defendant of a fair trial.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. White · State v. Goins“[e]vidence of other crimes is highly prejudicial and should be received only when there is a strict necessity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sapien · State v. Matthews
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.