Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 Tex. 594 - Pollard v. Steffens

Pollard v. Steffens’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
3
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 78 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably Hooks v. Hooks (1985), Hilley v. Hilley (1961)

6 federal appellate · 78 state decisions

340196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Throckmorton · Edds v. Mitchell, Admr. · Wagner v. Warnasch · Wagner v. Warnasch · Hilley v. Hilley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whenever a person is ignorant or mistaken with respect to his own antecedent and existing private legal rights, interests, estates, duties, liabilities, or other relations, either of property or contract or personal status, and enters into some transaction the legal scope and operation of which he correctly apprehends and understands, for the purpose of affecting such assumed rights, interests, or relations, or of carrying out such assumed duties or liabilities, equity will grant its relief, defensive or affirmative, treating the mistake as analogous to, if not identical with, a mistake of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an agreed judgment is accorded the same degree of finality and binding force as a final judgment rendered at the conclusion of an adversary proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.