161 Tex. Crim. 247 - Ex Parte Estep’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1964
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on James v. Shaughnessy · People v. Estep · 346 Ill. App. 132 - People v. Estep · 104 Ind. App. 418 - General American Tank Car Corp. v. Zapala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the federal authorities desire to prevent the extradition, it is a matter of their own concern. “The Governor’s warrant is regular upon its face and, so far as the State courts are concerned, authorizes appellant’s extradition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex parte Hale
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.