161 Tex. Crim. 283 - Curry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1999
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fulghum v. Baxley · 157 Tex. Crim. 592 - Bryan v. State · Jordan v. State · Bastardo v. State · 104 Tex. Crim. 232 - Whitfield v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The record reveals that no objection was made at the time this testimony was admitted, and no reason is advanced why the obj ection was not made at that time. In the absence of a timely and appropriate objection, no error is shown.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gonzales v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.