161 Tex. Crim. 30 - Fowler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1982
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 157 Tex. Crim. 91 - Martinez v. State · 159 Tex. Crim. 571 - Musgrove v. State · 160 Tex. Crim. 324 - McGill v. State · Cox v. State · 147 Tex. Crim. 383 - Chambless v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It [the legislature] went further and expressly provided that if facts exist which rendered the argument not objectionable, or subject to the complaint leveled thereat, the trial court was expressly authorized to require that the bill of exception reflect such facts."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reason whereby the argument complained of would not be error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.