Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 U.S. 57 - Harrison v. Fortlage

Harrison v. Fortlage’s Empirical Analysis

161 U.S. 57 · 1896

Citation profile

185
cited by 185 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

74 federal appellate · 14 district · 66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 185 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2015 · most notably The Eliza Lines (1895), United States v. Joe Freeman (1915)

74 federal appellate · 14 district · 66 state decisions — followed in 18 states

3401896190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating Machine Co. · Norrington v. Wright · The Maggie Hammond · Cleveland Rolling-Mill Co v. Rhodes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 185 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that any person has an insurable interest in property, by the existence of which he will gain an advantage, or by the destruction of which he will suffer a loss, whether he has or has not any title in, or lien upon, or possession of the property itself.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The court is not at liberty, either to disregard words used by the parties, descriptive of the subject-matter, or of any material incident, or to insert words which the parties have not made use of.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Shipping or to be shipped during this month from the Philippines to Philadelphia, per steamer Empress of India.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.