Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 Vt. 35 - Ball v. Melsur Corp.

Ball v. Melsur Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
6
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Lamb v. Geovjian (1996), Haynes v. Golub Corp. (1997)

69 state decisions

290199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Musser v. States · Boyd v. United States · Alamo National Bank v. Kraus · State v. Savo · Richard v. Richard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] motion which is filed in violation of [Rule 40(e)(1)] shall not for this reason be denied”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “These general principles are not ... limited to the 'employer-employee' relationship as defined in OSHA ..., though OSHA ... penalties for their violation would follow only where those statutes apply.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Absent evidence of an abuse of discretion, we defer to the trial court to determine issues of compromise as it is in a better position to determine the question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.