Peters v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Relies on Indian Towing Company v. United States · Denis Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State · Cp Chemical Company Inc v. United States US · Akutowicz v. United States · LaShay v. Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny claim based upon an act or omission of an employee of the state exercising due care, in the execution of a statute or ^regulation, whether or not such statute or regulation is valid, or based upon the exercise or performance or failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a state agency or an employee of the state, whether or not the discretion involved is abused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.